Короб Александр Николаевич

The study is devoted to integration of monetization system of Belarusian universities business based on cluster relations development, which is a progressive movement towards universities of third-generation. To conduct the scientific search, the author used the methodological basis of institutional theory and stakeholder management. The practical side of the study was based on the possibilities of legal registration of relations between higher education institution and the subject of the economy real sector, taking into account the institutional features of delegating entrepreneurial risks. The combination of theoretical tools and practical institutional conditions allowed substantiating cluster relations as the most appropriate in the implementation of University 3.0 concept. Using the functioning model of accounting services business incubator in combination with the forms of cluster development implementation allowed the author to identify the transition stages to third-generation university. At the stage of simple partnership, the university's mentoring assistance is expected in creating its own accounting business for graduates of educational programs. Successful implementation of this stage is the basis of transition to complex cluster form – cluster development under franchise brand, which will become third-generation university.

The article examines formation processes of entrepreneurial university (better known in Russian-speaking environment as "University 3.0") in Belarusian institutional system. The purpose of the study is to substantiate recommendations for transformation of entrepreneurial university model based on cluster relations. On the basis of literature review and previous monographic research by the author, the necessity of forming an entrepreneurial university model is reasoned, the forms of interaction between participants of educational initiative, and differences in approaches to model clustering of entrepreneurial university are considered. The methods of literary review, comparison, juxtaposition, argumentation, and generalization were used. On the basis of state regulation specifics of the economy and business entities interaction, it is recommended to create entrepreneurial university in the form of clusters of the subjects of education, science and business at regional and sectoral levels. Using institutional theory and stakeholder management, conducting a SWOT analysis of transformation scenario of entrepreneurial university model based on cluster relations as a result of structural economic transformation allowed the author to make recommendations on implementation of structural transformation of entrepreneurial university model in Belarusian institutional system.

The article examines the initial stage of housing and communal services reforming in Belarus. The subject of the study is based on parametric reforms of the sphere. Under parametric reforms the author understands the regulatory effects of state bodies on the object of management within the framework of the current system of economic relations. In the course of parametric reforms, there is a purposeful change in economic norms, standards, tariffs, prices, and the amount of budget financing, which partially stabilizes the situation in the industry under consideration. In the course of the study, the author proposed a scheme for harmonizing the economic interests of housing and communal services company and consumers in the service market and a graphical model of planned loss-making enterprise functioning. These tools make it possible to solve the problems of cross-subsidization when paying for housing and communal services and planned loss-making enterprises in the industry. The author suggests the following criteria for evaluating parametric reforms in housing and communal services of Belarus: paternalism, subsidized costs and budget revenues effectiveness. Based on these criteria, the author substantiates such indicators as paternalism level, subsidization coefficient of costs and budget revenues profitability. These proposals make it possible to justify not only the priority parametric reforms of housing and communal services of Belarus, but also to outline the approaches to structural and institutional reforms.